Wallerlaw.com
Disclaimer
CMS Taps the Brakes on New Payment Models
Back


CMS Taps the Brakes on New Payment Models

08.18.17

On August 17, CMS posted a proposed rule on the Federal Register that will significantly scale back mandatory bundled payments models. The rule, CMS–5524–P, proposes to:

Comments on the proposed rule are due on or before October 16. 

Dr. Tom Price, Secretary of HHS, has been particularly concerned about provider bundled payment initiatives. All three programs had been implemented in a flurry of activity during the final full month of the Obama Administration.  The programs had been previously delayed, but were scheduled to begin on January 1, 2018. 

While there have been many individual success stories regarding the success of prior voluntary incentive payment models, CMS had received criticism for implementing mandatory programs and forcing providers to incur the disruption and costs of implementation of such mandatory programs without hard data to back-up the projected cost savings.

Regarding the CJR model, CMS reduced the number of mandatory geographic areas participating in program the from 67 to 34 and excluded low-volume hospitals. Newly excluded providers may continue to participate, however, on a voluntary basis.  Memphis, Austin and Tuscaloosa remain on the mandatory list, while Nashville was moved to the voluntary list.  As proposed, the Episode Payment Models and the Cardiac Rehabilitation incentive payment models would be cancelled completely.  Because many organizations have invested significant time and money preparing for the mandatory programs and expected to be able to continue on a voluntary basis, CMS will likely receive numerous comments on this issue. 

CMS provided its rationale for the Proposed Rule and move away from mandatory bundled payment programs as follows: “We are concerned that engaging in large mandatory episode payment model efforts at this time may impede our ability to engage providers, such as hospitals, in future voluntary efforts. Similarly, we also believe that reducing the number of providers required to participate in the CJR model will allow us to continue to evaluate the effects of such a model while limiting the geographic reach of our current mandatory models.”



Top of Page